Archive for May, 2009

I’m Confused And Scared


Now I’m so confused. He seems to make sense, but he can’t be right! Can He? Maggie Gallagher told me The Gays don’t deserve to have marriages. And what is this he said about considering my wife to be property? Can I have that kind of marriage still? Oh and is it wrong for me to think he is attractive?

Comments (20)

The Truthe® Comes From Maine

lighthouseOur fellow haters and bigots in the great state of Maine are in a struggle to undo the sinful work of activist judges the state’s elected officials. While The Gays claimed victory against discrimination on May 05, our kind is working hard to get the civil rights of a minority group suppressed by mob rule a majority vote by a potential ballot question.

The fine bigots at the Maine Marriage Alliance have done extensive research to answer the commonly asked questions about marriage. When asked how allowing two men or two women down the street to marry might affect your straight marriage performed in a Las Vegas drive thru chapel, they provide this brilliant answer:

Legal recognition for openly non-monogamous gay unions would effectively destroy the taboo on adultery. The result is a continual downfall of families and society.

Stanley Kurtz, a research fellow at Stanford University explains: “What we need to understand — but do not — is that gay marriage will undermine the structure of taboos that continue to protect heterosexual marriage — and will do so far more profoundly than either the elimination of sodomy laws, or the general sexual loosening of the past thirty years. Above all, marriage is protected by the ethos of monogamy — and by the associated taboo against adultery. The real danger of gay marriage is that it will undermine the taboo on adultery, thereby destroying the final bastion protecting marriage: the ethos of monogamy.”

It’s so obvious! Even though The Gays are fighting for official recognition of their love and willingness to commit to a lifelong monogamous relationship, what they really want to do is sleep with the straight husband or wife down the street. Once we allow The Gays to rise to the same level of love as we straights have, then the logical outcome is that straight men will suddenly become adulterers. Never you mind that the whole point of Gay Marriage is to celebrate and recognize monogamous gay relationships. They are of course lying and are really just looking for a best bud to go to swingers parties with.

P.S. — We borrowed that lighthouse picture from Maine Marriage Alliance’s website. We completely disagree that it looks like a penis and two testicles.

Leave a Comment

Man-Duck Marriages Are Next!

This video speaks the truthe. If we allow two men to marry and form a committed lifelong relationship, the logical conclusion is that we will have to allow a man and his duck to get married too. It’s a slippery slope people! It’s especially slippery when all that water slides off the duck’s oil-based water repellent feathers. Maybe the GGRU project needs to harvest some uropygial glands for further study!

Comments (7)

Fuck You!

Comments (9)

California Supreme Court Upholds Prop 8

No witty comments. Just thought you should watch:

Leave a Comment

Gay Marriage Will Cause More Economic Hardship

Michael SteeleThe brilliant and politically relevant GOP Chairman Michael Steele has uncovered another societal downfall that gay marriage will bring:

Now all of a sudden I’ve got someone who wasn’t a spouse before, that I had no responsibility for, who is now getting claimed as a spouse that I now have financial responsibility for. So how do I pay for that? Who pays for that? You just cost me money.

Chairman Steele made this statement to a group of true believers at a state GOP convention in Georgia. We here at the GGRU project completely agree with Chairman’s Steele’s statement. He is absolutely right. In fact, we believe that in these dire economic times, small business owners need to be protected from all unexpected costs. There should be a temporary ban on all marriages until we rescue the economy. Small business owners should not have to live up to their obligations to support families unless they budgeted for it 10 years ago.

If The Gays get their way, every male employee who is still single will jump at the chance to marry their best friend or roommate. There will be an overnight increase in health care costs associated with dependent spouses. Never you mind that a civilized society is supposed to support committed relationships and that money spent on health care or other benefits will be returned through a healthier population and increased employee output. Please ignore the fact that no one stops your Christian coworkers from fathering 12 children, who all get put on the company health insurance. Society can’t afford change. We’ve got real bills to pay!

Comments (1)

Personal Gay Repellent Umbrella

umbrellanewsteam_450x450 A press release was just sent to us by a former New York City doctor (he had to choose his faith over his practice, obviously). He now lives in Los Banos, CA where he is assisting in the most recent concept and construction for a personal version of the Giant Gay Repellent Umbrella. The heavily guarded Los Banos division of the GGRU Project has produced this prototype which is being seriously investigated and considered for nationwide distribution (if proven successful and effective) by the National Organization for Man Lady Marriage. These personal versions may have to be sufficient protection until we can get the Giant Gay Repellent Umbrella built.

If you live in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont or Maine you will likely need one of these personal sized umbrellas immediately. To our fellow bigots in New Hampshire and New York, we can only hope your state legislators wise up and embrace the hatred they need to continue to deny the simple civil right of marriage to The Gays.

He sent us this exclusive photo of the prototype. The rainbow trimming on the tester’s clothing is obviously there to help attract more of The Gays so as to help prove the effectiveness of this personal version of the GGRU. So exciting!

Comments (7)